A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
✓Claimant Jorge Arango Mejia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia C-379/16.
Luego de verificar que la petición no está relacionada con aspectos que merezcan duda sobre la parte resolutiva de la precitada providencia, sino de cuestionamientos sobre su notificación o sobre actuaciones anteriores a la promulgación de la misma, que incluso han sido incorporados en una solicitud de nulidad de dicho fallo, el cual será decidido en su oportunidad procesal, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLA, por improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- RECHAZAR POR IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia C-379 de 2016, formulada por el ciudadano Jorge Arango Mejia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.